Cloud is treated as outsourcing
MAS publishes Guidelines on Outsourcing in two versions, one for banks and one for financial institutions other than banks. The non-bank version, updated in January 2025, contains an annex on cloud computing. Its starting position is clear: MAS considers cloud services operated by service providers to be a form of outsourcing.
That framing matters more than it first appears. It means a cloud data room, a cloud file store or a hosted accounting system is not a special category with its own rulebook. The guidelines say the types of risk in cloud services are not distinct from those in other outsourcing arrangements, so the same due diligence, governance and risk management apply.
The annex also asks institutions to be aware of characteristics typical of cloud services: multi-tenancy, data commingling and a higher propensity for processing to be carried out in multiple locations. Those three points are, in practice, the questions a careful buyer should put to any provider. Who else shares the environment? How is my data kept apart from theirs? Where, physically, is my data processed and stored?
What the guidelines ask of the agreement
For material outsourcing arrangements, the guidelines say the outsourcing agreement should include clauses that allow the institution to conduct audits on the service provider and its sub-contractors, and to obtain copies of audit reports and findings. They also say customer information should be used by the service provider and its staff strictly for the purpose of the contracted service, and disclosed to the provider only on a need-to-know basis.
Even if you are not a financial institution, these are sensible questions to borrow. They describe what good control over an outside provider looks like, and many firms that serve financial institutions find their clients asking them the same things.
Who is accountable
The guidelines place oversight with the institution's board and senior management. The board, or a committee it delegates to, approves the framework for evaluating outsourcing risks, and senior management runs it. Responsibility for managing the risk stays with the institution, not the provider.