Compliance

NDAs and confidentiality agreements: same thing, different label?

Before a buyer, investor or partner sees anything sensitive, Singapore businesses usually ask them to sign something. Sometimes it is called a non-disclosure agreement, sometimes a confidentiality agreement or a confidentiality undertaking.

This article explains how the labels are used in practice, which terms deserve a careful read, and where an agreement ends and practical controls have to take over. It is general information only. A Singapore lawyer should draft or review any agreement you rely on.

The labels are used loosely

In everyday deal practice, NDA and confidentiality agreement are often used interchangeably. Some advisers use NDA for a short, simple document and confidentiality agreement for a longer one with more detailed obligations. Others use whichever term their firm's template happens to carry. You will also see one-way documents, where only one side is sharing, called confidentiality undertakings or letters.

Because the names overlap so much, the title tells you very little. What matters is what the document actually says: who is bound, what information is covered, what the recipient may do with it, and for how long. Two documents with the same title can say very different things, and two with different titles can be almost identical.

One-way or mutual

The first practical distinction is direction. In a sale, the seller does almost all the disclosing, so a one-way agreement protecting the seller is common. In a joint venture, a technology partnership or a merger of equals, both sides share sensitive material, and a mutual agreement that binds both parties is more usual.

A mutual agreement is not automatically fairer. If one party will in fact disclose far more than the other, the drafting needs to reflect that. Ask your adviser which form suits the shape of your transaction.

Terms worth reading closely

Whatever the document is called, these are the provisions that usually decide how useful it is. They are prompts for a conversation with your lawyer, not a drafting checklist.

  • Definition of confidential information. Is it everything disclosed, or only material marked confidential? Does it include the fact that talks are taking place?
  • Permitted purpose. Is use limited to evaluating the transaction, or drafted more widely?
  • Permitted recipients. Can the counterparty share with its advisers, financiers and group companies, and are they required to bind those people too?
  • Duration. How long do the obligations last, and do some categories, such as trade secrets, last longer?
  • Return or destruction. What must happen to documents and copies when talks end, and what may be kept for legal or regulatory reasons?
  • Non-solicitation. Some agreements stop the recipient approaching your staff or customers for a period.
  • Remedies and governing law. What happens if the agreement is broken, and which law and forum apply?
  • Personal data. If the documents contain personal data, how the recipient must handle it alongside its own obligations under the PDPA.

Where the agreement stops and controls begin

An agreement gives you a remedy if confidential information is misused. It does not stop the misuse from happening, and it does not tell you that it happened. If a bidder's analyst forwards your management accounts to a friend at a competitor, the agreement might help you afterwards, but only if you can show what was shared, with whom and when.

That is why experienced sellers pair the agreement with practical controls. Limit what each party sees to what they need at that stage. Keep copies from multiplying. Make every page traceable to the person who viewed it. And keep a record that would stand up if you ever had to rely on the agreement.

The return or destruction clause is a good example. Asking a counterparty to destroy downloaded copies relies entirely on their honesty and their filing. If they only ever viewed documents in a room that you can close, there are fewer copies to chase in the first place.

Asking for acceptance at the door

Signed agreements usually cover the counterparty as an organisation. In a busy process, though, the individuals who actually read the documents change: a new analyst joins, an external accountant is brought in. Many sellers like each person to acknowledge confidentiality terms personally before they see anything.

ShareAndGo can ask every visitor to accept your confidentiality terms before a room opens, and keeps a record of who accepted and when. That acceptance is a step in your process, not a substitute for the agreement your lawyer prepares. It simply means nobody reaches the documents without first being shown the terms you set.

The controls that sit behind it

Once inside, each party sees only the folders you allow for its group. You choose whether people can download, print or copy, and view-only readers see documents rendered on our side with their name, email address and the date on every page, so a leaked page names its source. Invitations can carry an end date and be revoked when talks end.

Every view, download, invitation and change is written to an audit log, chained so that alterations are detectable, and exportable as a spreadsheet. If you ever need to show what a counterparty was given, you can answer from the record. Your documents, records and files are stored in Singapore, and our privacy page lists the services that run elsewhere.

Frequently asked questions

Is an NDA different from a confidentiality agreement?
Often not in substance. The labels are used loosely in practice, and the terms of the document matter more than its title. Ask your lawyer to review the actual wording.
Does accepting terms in ShareAndGo replace a signed agreement?
No. It records that each visitor was shown and accepted your terms before entering. Whether that is enough for your transaction is a question for your lawyer.
Can I use different terms for different parties?
Each room can carry its own terms, so a buyer's room and a lender's room can ask for different acceptances.